The FOS (financial Ombudsman) has recently complained to the industry's regulator that it thinks that lending sources are deliberately attempting to frustrate the Ombudsman's process. It thinks that a number of lenders have been guilty of opposing out of hand all consumer bids to reclaim, and in the financial year ending 2009 89% of cases of peoples' mis-sold loan payment cover dealt with by the Ombudsman were found in the consumer's favour.
There isn't anything the matter with PPI for those who have to have such protection. Of course there is a place for your mis-sold loan payment cover. Its job is to provide cover for loan or card payments in cases of mishap, period of sickness or unemployment. It is specially useful in the present economic context. But if you got a PPI policy from your lender, it is probable that you are paying massively over the odds, so you really should check if you can get the same elsewhere for less.
The financial regulator has been heavily fining Payment protection firms left, right, and centre for not treating consumers equitably, also the Competition commission has scrutinized this sector and made some demands on lenders, also including outlawing transactions within one week of selling a visa credit card or loan and completely prohibiting single premium plans.
It must be an awful instant when you think about your mis-sold loan payment cover and the pointlessness of it. Fortunately there are legal precedents which permit the overturning of this wrongdoing and the recovery of funds. The law exists to protect the consumer's interests.
The outcome of any legal action brought in accordance with consumers' mis-sold loan payment cover will be binding and is a test case for future consumer legislation to come. What matters is that the consumer is completely compensated for all the money which has been wasted. The law in the United Kingdom is nowadays justly implanted against the swindlers who bring about such malpractice.