The financial watchdog has been penalising Payment protection insurance companies in many situations for not treating customers decently, plus the Competition commission has examined this sector and made a number of requirements on these lenders, also including banning sales within seven days of selling a visa card or loan and comprehensively outlawing single premium cover.
The FOS (financial Ombudsman) has taken issue with the industry's regulator in that it thinks lenders are deliberately attempting to frustrate the Ombudsman procedure. It says that some lending sources have been rejecting out of hand all consumer endeavours to reclaim their loss, and in the financial year ending 2009 as many as 89 per cent of cases of consumers'' mis-sold cheap loan protection dealt with by the FOS were decided in the consumer's favour.
There's nothing wrong about Protection insurance for those who need it. Of course there's a place for your mis-sold cheap loan protection. Its job is to provide cover for loan or card payment upkeep in cases of accident, illness or joblessness. This is conspicuously useful in the present financial context. Yet if you were sold a Payment protection policy from the lender, it's more than likely that you are paying very much much more than necessary, so you must first check if the same is available elsewhere for less.
The result of any action brought in according with peoples mis-sold cheap loan protection is binding and will set a precedent for deciding consumer legislation to come. What finally matters is that the customer is fully recompensed for all the money which has been lost. Legal precedent in the UK is by now effectively entrenched counter to the charlatans who perpetrate these practices.
It must be an awful moment when you consider your mis-sold cheap loan protection and the waste it turned out to be. Happily, legally procedures exist that permit the overturning of such wrongdoing and the restitution of funds. Such legislation exists to protect the rights of the consumer.